OUR POLITICIANS CAN STOP THIS NONSENSE IF SO MOTIVATED AND NOT DOING THE DRUG COMPANY’S BIDDING. DEMAND THE VICTIM’S EXPERTS, APPOINTED BY THE VICTIMS, BE THE ULTIMATE APPROVAL BODY OF ANY HEALTH RELATED GUIDELINES FOR ANY CONDITION, ILLNESS, OR DISEASE. ALL EVIDENCE BASED, PEER REVIEWED SCIENCE MUST BE LOOKED AT, NOT ONLY THAT WHICH IS DESIGNED FOR A PURPOSE AND USED BY QUASI-GOVERNMENTAL GROUPS WHO DO NOT CARE ABOUT THE HEALTH OF PEOPLE.
DSM-IV Boss Presses Attack on New Revision
By John Gever, Deputy Managing Editor, MedPage Today
Published: May 17, 2013
A new edition of psychiatry’s diagnostic guide “will probably lead to substantial false-positive rates and unnecessary treatment,” charged the man who led development of the last version.
To be released this weekend at the American Psychiatric Association’s annual meeting, the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or DSM-5, “introduce[s] several high-prevalence diagnoses at the fuzzy boundary with normality,” according to Allen Frances, MD, who chaired the task force responsible for DSM-IV issued in 1994.
Frances, now an emeritus professor at DukeUniversity, wrote online in Annals of Internal Medicinethat changes from DSM-IV will apply disease labels to individuals who may be unhappy or offensive but still normal. Such individuals would include those experiencing “the forgetfulness of old age” as well as children with severe, chronic temper tantrums and individuals with physical symptoms with no medical explanation.